Blog

In 1963, I first learned about locally generated power. I was working on my junior high science project on solar power in Evanston, Ill. My pen pal, George Mathews, a Georgia peanut and cotton farmer, told me how excited he was when he made the first solar-powered phone call on Oct. 4, 1955 — and how rural customers who were far removed from other power sources would have better service.

Jump ahead to 2006, when as a Boulder city council member, I voted for the city’s original Climate Action Plan. It stated that a sustainable energy future in Boulder includes “renewable energy and distributed generation to hedge against energy price volatility and electric and natural gas distribution vulnerabilities.”

On a sunny day in 2010, on the top of Boulder’s 15th and Pearl parking garage, Gov. Bill Ritter signed bill HB10-1342: The Community Solar Gardens Act, championed by Boulder state legislators and now a model for several states. Solar gardens (community solar) are a form of distributed generation: a solar array with multiple subscribers who may purchase portions of the power produced and receive credits on their electric bills. Colorado became the first state in the nation to create legislation around solar gardens. The unique location of the bill signing was chosen because the tops of downtown parking garages and buildings were the kinds of places Boulder had in mind for its future solar gardens.

Eight years later, where are they? Where are Boulder’s solar gardens?

According to the State of Colorado website, Colorado leads the nation, with approximately 53 community solar projects in operation, generating 30 megawatts, with many more in development. None of these are in Boulder. A National Renewable Energy Laboratory report finds that 49 percent of households and 48 percent of businesses are unable to host photovoltaic solar systems on their rooftops, because they rent their spaces or lack suitable owned roof space. Keep in mind that more than 50 percent of Boulder’s housing is rental and this presents a challenge for smaller array rooftop solar. Solar gardens make a clean energy option available to more people.

It is time to get with the program and have solar gardens, as other places do.

Local distributed generation means creating electrons here in Boulder. Right now, the only real alternatives to solar panels on your rooftop are Xcel Energy’s Windsource and Renewable Connect programs. The electrons from these programs are generated and used in other parts of Colorado.

There are all kinds of opportunities to create solar gardens in Boulder — and partners like the city of Boulder, Boulder Valley School District, and many private companies with land and resiliency strategies (look at IBM’s solar array). There is vacant land that is not our open space that the city would like to remain vacant — land that we hope to deploy for future uses. A 25-year contract for solar generation could help that happen. Economically, it all makes sense.

What if every new building in Boulder (with a few exceptions) was required to have a PUC/Xcel-allowed photovoltaic system sized to 120 percent of its estimated energy use — or to participate (as regulations allow) in a solar garden? Total annual carbon free energy production resulting from the solar roofs and gardens could quickly reach or exceed hundreds of megawatts of installed capacity. NREL has told Boulder that this gets us to a resilient, distributed energy future.

Today, 62 years after that first solar-powered phone call, the most progressive voices in decarbonization see solar gardens as a key piece. Along with creative mobility options, solar gardens can also help us wean ourselves off natural gas for space heating. Even better, solar gardens support the city of Boulder’s environmental goals, whether or not we create a municipal utility. Either Xcel Energy or the city of Boulder can serve as the required “qualifying retail utility” and achieve the same goal.

I believe that solar gardens, along with electric mobility and moving from natural gas to electric heating, could work together to act like Boulder’s “Carbon Eraser.” It is time for Boulder to lead Colorado as it moves into a future with less carbon. We have explored many energy ventures. We should implement this one. Unless we include solar gardens in our portfolio, it will not be possible to economically reach our community environmental and resiliency goals.

Let’s power the things that we do with less carbon. Let’s sow the seeds for our solar gardens.

Our efforts to municipalize and to right-size Folsom Street remind me of the passion we felt in the 1960s about ending the war. Our absolute certainty about the dangers of the military-industrial complex and the war’s immorality trumped all else. The majority voting bloc on Boulder’s City Council seems to feel just as strongly that kicking the Xcel Coal and Bad Automobile giants in the knee will pay an environmental debt, vindicate us and demonstrate leadership.

Regarding municipalization, there may be better ways to reach our community’s environmental goals than the $10+ million estimated to have been spent, a couple million more in energy taxes being spent annually, and uncounted city employee hours, while still having Xcel’s help in emergencies. Possibilities include incentives for decarbonizing transportation, and less expensive lower-carbon energy resulting from subsidies for citywide distributed energy generation systems including small solar, urban windmills, solar gardens, batteries, and insulation.

Regarding right-sizing, community mobility in Boulder requires good bicycle routes running east-west and north-south, and right-sizing of appropriately selected streets is an important tool to meet the need. It’s unfortunate that the majority voting bloc on City Council has compromised street reconfiguration as a tool by fouling up Folsom Street. We could be taking more constructive steps toward happily achieving the world’s lowest carbon per mile traveled, instead of idling in traffic and angrily wagging green fingers.

As voters consider candidates, we should avoid perpetuating philosophically united voting blocs and instead support candidates who offer a more intellectually diverse reflection of our community, who will make important decisions in public view at, not before, their meetings.

This isn’t a “throw the bums out” letter. All our council members work hard and believe what they are doing is right. But the three incumbents running for re-election and the four who do not have to stand for re-election often vote as a bloc, one that has brought us municipalization, the historic preservation of a coal shed, and the so-called right-sizing of Folsom. The four incumbents will only need to convince one of the five newly-elected members to join them to continue down the path toward municipalizing our electricity and enact almost whatever they wish, whether most of us agree or not.

The council we seat will make financial decisions concerning momentous issues: Municipalization, buying and rebuilding the Broadway Boulder Community Hospital campus, building out the Civic Area, subsidized housing at the Boulder Junction site and others — decisions involving more than a billion dollars in new taxes and debt.

If you believe the sitting City Council’s decisions and initiatives are wonderful, please vote to re-elect the three incumbents running and fill the two empty seats with people just like them. If not, choose from the other highly qualified folks offering to serve. One important thing that the voting bloc, the ninth councilman, George Karakehian, and I seem to agree on is that voting for issues 300 and 301 would be dangerous, disruptive and expensive. Boulder Mayor Matt Appelbaum and five of his predecessors wrote a letter opposing the two citizen-initiated ballot issues. The co-signers said the measures “would pit neighbors against neighbors, leave the city stalled and leave problems of growth and development unsolved.” Another unintended consequence would be having to hire even more city employees to try and make 300 and 301 work.

It is time to end the battle with Xcel, the efforts to make parking difficult and being concerned about how many people are in a car. It is time to elect a council that leads us toward being a happy, healthy, art-filled, low-carbon-footprint city. A model, innovator, and test site for creating environmental, efficient government, and other best practices. A city that demonstrates what is possible, because it can.

Google and other companies want to be in Boulder. The whole world now knows this is a best place to live, retire, raise a family, innovate, walk and breathe on world-class open space, start a company, and eat delicious food.

So please vote, and encourage your neighbors to vote, so a larger percentage of us choose our council members. This November, it should take more than the 11,000 or 12,000 votes that often win a city council seat in a non-national election year.

Vote, so that we can more happily pull the oars together behind strong, more independent leaders on Boulder’s City Council.